Publication Ethics

National Conference FISIP Syekh-Yusuf is journal that use peer-review process. This journal follows the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which deal with all aspects of publication ethics and, in particular, how to handle cases of research and publication misconduct. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including the author, the Editor-in-Chief, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewers­­­­­and publisher (Syekh Yusuf Tangerang Islamic University Communication Studies Program). Jurnal Dialektika Komunika is dedicated to following best practices on ethical issues, errors, and revocation. Prevention of publication malpractice is one of the important responsibilities of the editorial board. Any form of unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the journal does not tolerate plagiarism in any form.

National Conference FISIP Syekh-Yusuf adapt COPE to meet high-quality ethical standards for publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers. As an important issue, publication ethics needs to be clearly explained in order to improve the quality of research worldwide. In this section, we describe standards for editors, authors, and reviewers. The publisher has no right to interfere with the integrity of the content and only supports timely publishing.

Author Ethics

1. Reporting; The author must provide information about the process and results of research and/or studies to the editor in an honest, clear and comprehensive manner, and keep the research data and studies properly and safely stored.
2. Originality and plagiarism; The author must ensure that the manuscript that has been sent or submitted to the editor is an original manuscript, written by the author himself, and is sourced from his own ideas and ideas, and not the result of plagiarizing other people's writings or ideas and or ideas. Authors are strictly prohibited from changing the names of sources cited to other people's names.
3. Delivery repetition; the author must inform that the manuscript sent or submitted to the editor is a manuscript that has never been sent or submitted to another journal or publication publisher. If there is a "redundancy" in sending manuscripts to other publishers, the editor will reject the manuscript sent by the author.
4. Author status; the author must inform the editor that the writer has competence or qualifications in a certain field of expertise in accordance with the field of published science, namely the fields of Obstetrics, Reproductive Health, and Public Health. The author must include affiliation, namely the origin of the author's agency. The author who sends the manuscript to the editor is the first author (co-author), so that if problems are found in the process of publishing the manuscript, it can be resolved immediately.
5. Script writing errors; The author must immediately inform the editor if an error is found in writing the manuscript, both the results of the review and the edits. These writing errors include writing names, affiliations or agencies, quotations, and other writings that can reduce the meaning and substance of the text. If that happens, the author must immediately propose improvements to the manuscript.
6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the author must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that manuscripts can be processed smoothly and safely.

Editorial Ethics

1. Publication decision; the editor must ensure that the manuscript review process is thorough, transparent, objective, fair, and thoughtful. This becomes the basis of the editor in making a decision on a manuscript, whether it is rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board acts as a manuscript selection team.
2. Publication information; The editor must ensure that guidelines for writing manuscripts for authors and other interested parties can be accessed and read clearly, both in print and electronic versions.
3. Distribution of peer-reviewed manuscripts; the editor must ensure the reviewer and the manuscript material for review, as well as clearly inform the provisions and process for reviewing the manuscript to the reviewer.
4. Objectivity and neutrality; Editors must be objective, neutral and honest in editing manuscripts, regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group and nationality of the author.
5. confidentiality; the editor must take good care of any information, especially related to the privacy of the author and the distribution of the manuscript.
6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the editor must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely.

Reviewer Ethics

1. Objectivity and neutrality; reviewers must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only side with scientific truth. The process of reviewing the manuscript is carried out professionally without distinguishing gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group, and the author's nationality.
2. Clarity of reference sources; the reviewer must ensure that the source of references/quotes from the manuscript is appropriate and credible (accountable). If an error or deviation is found in writing a reference/citation source, the reviewer must immediately inform the editor for corrections to be made by the author according to the notes from the reviewer.
3. Peer-reviewed effectiveness; the reviewer must respond to the manuscript that has been sent by the editor and work according to the established peer-review time (maximum 3 weeks). If you need additional time in reviewing the manuscript, you must immediately report (confirm) to the editorial secretariat.
4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; reviewers must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely.

Journal Management Ethics

1. Decision-making; the journal manager or editorial board must describe the mission and goals of the organization, especially those related to establishing policies and making decisions on publishing journals without any particular interest.
2. Freedom; Journal managers must give freedom to reviewers and editors to create a comfortable working atmosphere and respect the author's privacy.
3. Guarantees and promotions; Journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyright), and be transparent in managing funds received by third parties. In addition, journal managers must publish and promote published results to the public by guaranteeing the benefits of using the manuscript.
4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; Journal managers must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely.