PENEGAKKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU PENYALAHGUNAAN JABATAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN DAN PENCUCIAN UANG

Abstract

Many Crimes and violations have sprung up in Indonesia in various modes. This study aims to determine and analyze the motives of perpetrators of abusing office in the criminal act of embezzlement in office, law enforcement against perpetrators of embezzlement in office and money laundering and punishment in decision number 114 / Pid / 2019 / PT Yyk has reflected the elements of deterrent effects and laws and regulations on perpetrators of embezzlement in office and the judge's consideration in deciding criminal cases embezzlement in office and money laundering in Decision Number 114/Pid/2019/PT Yyk. The method used is Normative Juridical, descriptive analytical in nature with data analysis carried out qualitatively and the theoretical basis refers to applicable laws and regulations with legal theories and positive law implementation practices concerning the issues discussed. Embezzlement has the potential to occur when integrity is pawned due to several factors. Both intentional and unthinkable, due to low financial literacy of employees. Cases related to embezzlement of company assets or money by employees often occur. The motive is that there are deviations from SOPs and irregularities in recording financial transactions and reporting responsibilities. Law enforcement against perpetrators of embezzlement can be carried out penal efforts using criminal law means (ultimum remidium). Law enforcement officials carry out their respective roles and functions in responding to crime. However, the sanctions imposed have not been enough to cause a deterrent effect so that it is feared that this criminal act is increasingly rife.

Keywords : Embezzlement, crime, conviction, money laundering