ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN PASAL114 AYAT 2 UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM YANG MENJATUHKAN PIDANA PENJARA SEUMUR

Abstract

One of the government's efforts in preventing and providing narcotics for the benefit of treatment and health services is to legally regulate the distribution, import, export, planting, and use of narcotics in a controlled manner and carry out strict supervision. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasise the need for crime prevention efforts to be integrated with overall social policies and national development planning. The purpose of the study is to determine and analyse the settlement regarding the imposition of life imprisonment in narcotics crime cases. To determine the considerations of the panel of judges in imposing life imprisonment in Decision Number 96 / Pid.Sus / 2023 / PN Jkt.Brt, to find out if the decision of the panel of judges of the West Jakarta Court Number 96 / Pid.Sus / 2023 / PN Jkt.Brt is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The research method used is an empirical juridical approach. Then, the data obtained are compiled, explained, and analysed by providing conclusions. The research results indicate that the imposition of life imprisonment is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and also provides legal protection for the nation and state from the illicit trafficking of narcotics. This sentence is intended to prevent the illicit trafficking of narcotics in society. Therefore, one way to break the chain of illicit drug trafficking is to impose life imprisonment on perpetrators of narcotics crimes.

Keywords: Narcotics, Supervision, Social Policy, Crime, Prison, and life.