TINJAUAN YURIDIS EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN PEMISAHAN BERKAS PERKARA PIDANA (SPLITSING) OLEH JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PROSES PENUNTUTAN

Abstract

Research based on what is obtained in the field regarding the separation of criminal case files (Splitsing) this aims to determine the effectiveness in the prosecution process, basically there are many criminal acts committed by the community, especially narcotics crimes, thus as the Police have the right to conduct investigations regarding problems that arise in the community. to find out the truth of the mistakes made. In certain crimes, especially narcotics crimes, in this case there is a lack of testimony. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness or success rate of using (Splitsing) in court. The research method used is empirical juridical where research is carried out by going directly to the field in order to obtain correct and accountable data. The nature of the research used in this study is descriptive analysis. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Methods and tools of data collection in this study contained primary and secondary data. The results of this study indicate that the separation of case files must have certain criteria, and if this (Splitsing) is juxtaposed with the Inoself-incirmination Principle and the Cosatantie Justie Principle, it will not be relevant or effective because it does not meet what is meant by fast and low-cost trial and criteria. from the principle of presumption of innocence on the testimony of each other (Witness Crown)