ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PENGULANGAN PERBUATAN PIDANA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DIKAITKAN DENGAN TEORI TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN

Authors

  • Kristophorus Agustino Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf
  • Sumardi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf
  • Dadi Waluyo Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf

Keywords:

Korupsi, Pengulanan Perbuatan Pidana, Pidana Penjara.

Abstract

It is a mutual agreement that corruption is classified as an extraordinary crime. Because it falls into the category of extraordinary crime, it also requires extraordinary handling. The problem in this research is whether the decision of the panel of judges in imposing a prison sentence on the convict in corruption case Number: 237 PK/Pid.Sus/2020 has been given sufficient legal consideration and whether the panel of judges' decision in imposing a prison sentence is in line with the purpose of sentencing. The method used by the author in this research is the normative juridical method. Based on the results of the research and discussion, the conclusion is: Regarding decision Number: 237 PK/Pid.Sus/2020, according to the author's opinion, the reconsideration panel of judges was not sufficiently careful in considering the actions previously committed by the convict.

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Agustino, K. ., Sumardi, & Waluyo, D. (2026). ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PENGULANGAN PERBUATAN PIDANA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DIKAITKAN DENGAN TEORI TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN. Lex Veritatis, 4(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unis.ac.id/index.php/JournalMahasiswa/article/view/5427