Government- Pulled Triple Helix for Supporting National Aircraft Industry in the Global Value Chain with Tipology Hierarchy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33592/perspektif.v1i1.78Keywords:
triple helix, global value chain, aircraft industry, soft systems methodology.Abstract
This study reconstructs the government- pulled triple helix for supporting national aircraft industry in the Global Value Chain (gvc) with tipology hierarchy. By employing Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), this research revealed that Triple Helix Model for development aircraft industry directed to design Macro Policy, revitalize test laboratories, strengthen aircraft financing policy, building supporting Industries and empower aerospace human resources. The government-pulled triple helix model has overlapping the role played by Academia (A), Busines (B), and Government (G) in the development of the aircraft industry. In fact, according to Etkowitz, H. (2008) that overlapping of role only occurs in university pushed triple helix model. In addition, the configuration of actor G in  the triple helix needed for development national aircraft industry is not generic but based on specific context. In aircraft development, especially for strengthening the aerospace industry cluster, the role of association is also important. In the GVC of Aircraft Industry with typology of hierarchy, PT DI is required to be able to build networks with industry partners, domestic and foreign research institutions and aircraft component industry associations. The Government will obtain lesson learnt on how the strategy for supporting the national aircrafts development such as program of N 219, N 245 or R 80 which developed at present.
References
Checkland, P., Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, Teachers, and Students. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
______&Scholes. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Chu, B., Zhang, H., & Jin, F. (2010). Identification and comparison of aircraft industry clusters in China and United States. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(5), 471–480. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5.
Danishswara, G., & Darmawan, A. A. (2014). Regulasi terhadap bentuk jaminan kebendaan atas pesawat terbang sebagai obyek jaminan hutang dalam kredit perbankan. GEMA, Th. XXVI/4(2014–Juli 2014), 1403–1411.
Education, M. of R. T. and H. (2018). FGD: Pemetaan Kondisi Terkini dan tantangan industri pesawat terbang nasional. BSD.
Etkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action. Published in the UK by Routledge, 2008.
_____& Zhou, C. (2007). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation and entrepreneurship. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. http://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805.
Hardjosoekarto, S. (2013). Dual Imperatives of Action Research : Lessons from Theoretical Research Practice to Construct Social Development Index by Using Soft Systems Methodology, 3(1), 49–53. http://doi.org/10.5923/j.hrmr.20130301.10.
Etzkowitz, H & Leydesdorff. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘“Mode 2â€â€™ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29 (2000) 109–123, Research P.
Jones, H.G. (1999). Entrepreneurial Success and Failure in The Aviation Industry: The History of The Waco Aircraft Company, 1919-1963, Phd. thesis. Baltimore, Maryland United States: Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company.
Kemenko Maritim. (2018). Workshop: Koordinasi Kebijakan Percepatan Proyek Strategis Nasional Program Industri Dirgantara. Jakarta Indonesia. Retrieved from bit.ly/workshopdirgantara.
Kemenristekdikti. (2015). Laporan Akhir Kegiatan: Pengembangan Riset Iptek Strategis Nasional.
Mcguire, S. (2014). Global value chains and state support in the aircraft industry, 16(4), 615–639. http://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2014-0014.
Muzakir, M.A.I., Huseini, M., Hardjosoekarto, S. (2015). Proses Kebijakan Sebagai Hierarki dalam Mendorong Upgrading Teknologi pada Global Value Chain-Industri Pesawat Terbang Nasional (Analisis Kegagalan Program Pesawat N 250 IPTN), Phd. thesis. Jakarta Indonesia: FISIP UI, 2015. Retrieved from http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-4.
Pritchard, B. D. (2010). A Case for Repayable Launch Aid : Implications for the US Commercial Aircraft Supply Chain, (39).
PT RAI. (2014). Pengembangan R 80. Jakarta Indonesia.
Steenhuis, H., & Bruijn, E. (2004). High technology in developing countries: Analysis of technology strategy, technology transfer, and success factors in the aircraft industry, 1–13. Retrieved from http://doc.utwente.nl/51022/.
Stewart, T. P., Lawyers, T., & Group, A. (2007). China’s Industrial Subsidies Study: High Technology (Vol. 1).
Suijun (Lucy) Yi. (2013). A Boeing Strategy to Shape a Competitive Advantage: a phenomenological study. United State: Published by ProQuest LLC (2013).
Vertesy, D., & Szirmai, A. (2010). Interrupted Innovation : Innovation System Dynamics in Latecomer Aerospace Industries.
Westcombe, M. (2017). Soft Systems Methodology. Soft Systems Methodology, Workshop System Thinking- Soft Systems Methodology in Lancaster Managament School-UK, 2-16 December 2017.
