JURIDICAL REVIEW OF PROVING ELEMENTS WITHOUT RIGHTS OR UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OR POSSESSION OF CLASS I NARCOTICS AND CRIMINAL IMPOSITION UNDER SPECIAL MINIMUM CRIMINAL THREAT (Study of Decision Number: 5259 K/Pid.Sus/2022 Jo. Decision Number: 9/Pid. Sus/2021

Indonesia

Authors

  • Ferdi Firmansyah universitas islam syekh yusuf
  • Sumardi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf
  • Dadi Waluyo Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf

Abstract

Judges are the spearhead in deciding a case. Judges hold the highest authority in court, making their decisions immune to intervention. This research uses the Empirical Legal Research method with a Normative Juridical approach, utilizing secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. In this study, the author found a decision with Case Number: 5259 K/Pid.Sus/2022 Jo 9/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Amr. In this decision, the cassation-level judge made an error by failing to prove the element of unlawfulness, and the cassation-level judge deviated from the minimum sentence provision in Article 112 paragraph 1 of Law Number 35 of 2009 by imposing a sentence of 1 year and 6 months. Cassation-level judges must be more thorough in examining trial facts, and areview of the minimum criminal penalties in the narcotics law is necessary.

 

Keywords: Judge, Evidence, Court rulling.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Firmansyah, F., Sumardi, & Waluyo, D. (2026). JURIDICAL REVIEW OF PROVING ELEMENTS WITHOUT RIGHTS OR UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OR POSSESSION OF CLASS I NARCOTICS AND CRIMINAL IMPOSITION UNDER SPECIAL MINIMUM CRIMINAL THREAT (Study of Decision Number: 5259 K/Pid.Sus/2022 Jo. Decision Number: 9/Pid. Sus/2021: Indonesia. Lex Veritatis, 4(3), 38–46. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unis.ac.id/index.php/JournalMahasiswa/article/view/5222

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Lex Veritatis

Section

Articles