Analisis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Analisis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Pelaku Residivis Tindak Pidana Narkotika

Tindak Pidana Narkotika, Analisis, Residivis

Authors

  • Benny Irawan universitas sultan ageng tirtayasa
  • Hizkia Raymond universitas sultan ageng tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33592/pelita.v22i1.2886

Abstract

Abstract
In positive law, narcotics crimes are qualified as extraordinary crimes, because the
impact of these crimes has a dangerous situation that is widespread. Law No. 35 of 2009
is the basic rule for law enforcement officers to carry out law enforcement for
perpetrators. In Article 54 of the Law it is explained that judges are obliged to consider
conducting medical rehabilitation for drug users. In Decision No. 745/Pid. Sus/2018/PN
Srg, the defendant is a drug case recidivist who had previously been rehabilitated. By
using a normative juridical research method that uses the approach of legislation and
legal principles, this study aims to examine and determine the application of punishment
to recidives in Decision No. 745/Pid. Sus/2018/PN Srg by using the theory of judges' considerations and the purpose of sentencing. The results of this study are the application
of sanctions against narcotics crime recidivists must use the purpose of punishment which
results in a deterrent effect for the perpetrator, so that the perpetrator does not repeat the
action.

Author Biography

Benny Irawan, universitas sultan ageng tirtayasa

jurnal ok

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Andrisman, Tri. Asas-Asas Dan Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandar
Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2011.
Bachtiar. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Tangerang Selatan: Unpam Press, 2018.
Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhammad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai
Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Jurnal Gema Keadilan
07, no. 01 (2020). Efendi, J, and J Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Normatif Dan Empiris.
Prenadia Media Group, 2016.
Hiariej, Edward Omar Sharif. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya
Atma Pustaka, 2016.
Hulukutati, Tien S. Hukum Pidana. Bandung, 2014.
Kartanegara, Sathocid. Hukum Pidana, Kumpulan Kuliah Bagian Dua. Balai Lektur
Mahasiswa, n.d.
Khaeril, Muhammad Hafiluddin. “Tinjauan Kriminologis Terhadap Anak Sebagai
Residivis Di Kota Makassar.” Universitas Hasanuddin, 2014.
Muladi, and Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung:
Alumni, 1984.
Redaksi. “Tak Jera Karena Narkoba, Sonny Pawitan Kembali Diciduk.” Radar Banten.
Last modified 2017. Accessed July 27, 2022. https://www.radarbanten.co.id/tak-
jera-karena-narkoba-sony-pawitan-kembali-diciduk/.
S, Siswanto. Politik Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika. Jakarta: PT Rineka
Cipta, 2012.
Santoso, Topo. Hukum Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2021.
Signorelli, Walter P. Criminal Law, Procedure, and Evidence. London: CRC Press,
2011.
Triasmi, Tita Yulia, and Yana Indawati. “Efektivitas Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana
Rehabilitasi Terhadap Residivis Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Pengadilan Negeri
Surabaya.” Law Prohutek 01, no. 01 (2020).

Downloads

Published

2024-05-08

How to Cite

Irawan, B., & Raymond, H. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Analisis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Pelaku Residivis Tindak Pidana Narkotika: Tindak Pidana Narkotika, Analisis, Residivis. Pelita : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 22(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.33592/pelita.v22i1.2886