• Sumiati Sumiati SMAS Yaspih Rajeg



Today, technological development has given a new lease of life in language learning and teaching field. Particularly in terms of evaluation, some schools in Indonesia conduct national examination using computer-based test. Traditionally, testing in a class involves paper-based test which is familiar to students. A substantial number of studies have been conducted to compare both of the tests. The researcher investigated what activities were performed by the students throughout the tests, what kind of multiple choice tests the students prefer to do, and what the positive and negative side of those tests. This study presents a wonder share quiz creator (WSQC) program to facilitate the teachers to design a test. The data was collected by questionnaire, interview, observation, and quiz. In this study, the authors concluded that students in senior high school of Yaspih Rajeg prefer paper-based test for national examination.

Keywords: computer-based test, National Examination, paper-based test



Saat ini, perkembangan teknologi memberikan perubahan dalam dunia pengajaran dan pembelajaran bahasa. Khususnya dalam hal evaluasi, beberapa sekolah di Indonesia melakukan ujian nasional menggunakan tes berbasis komputer. Secara tradisional, pengujian di kelas melibatkan tes berbasis kertas yang akrab bagi siswa. Sejumlah besar studi telah dilakukan untuk membandingkan kedua tes. Peneliti menyelidiki kegiatan apa yang dilakukan oleh siswa selama tes, jenis tes pilihan ganda apa yang siswa sukai, dan apa sisi positif dan negatif dari tes tersebut. Penelitian ini menyajikan a wonder share quiz creator (WSQC) untuk memfasilitasi para guru untuk merancang tes. Data dikumpulkan dengan kuesioner, wawancara, observasi, dan kuis. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menyimpulkan bahwa siswa di SMA Yaspih Rajeg lebih suka ujian berbasis kertas untuk ujian nasional.

Kata kunci: tes berbasis komputer, Ujian Nasional, tes berbasis kertas


Al-amri, S. (2007). Computer-based vs. Paper-based Testing: Does the test administration mode matter? BAAL Conference.
Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, E-learning and Distance Education D. K. a. A. Tait. New York, Rout ledge.
Candrlic, S., M. A. Katic, et al. (2014). Online vs. Paper-based Testing: A Comparison of the Test Results.
MIPRO 2014. Coffman, T. (2009). Engaging Students Through Inquiry-Oriented Learning and Technology. United States of America, Row man & Littlefield Education
DeSouza, E. and M. Fleming (2003). A Comparison of In-Class and Online Quizzes on Student Examination Performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 14(2): 121-134.
Ghaderi, M. (2014). Comparing Between Computer based Test and Paper-and Pencil based Tests. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies. 2(4).
Gordon, A. M. (2015). Paper based Testing vs. Mobile Device Based Testing in an EFL Environment: What’s the Difference?. Department of English St. Cloud State University. Master of Arts English: Teaching English as A Second Language.
Heafner, T. (2004). Using Technology to Motivate Students to Learn Social Studies. Contempory Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 4(1): 42-53.
Hensley, K. K. (2015). Examinationing the Effects of Paper-based and Computer-based Modes of Assessment on Mathematics Curriculum-based Measurement. Doctor of Philosophy degree in Teaching and Learning(Special Education) in the Graduate College. Lowa City, The University of Iowa.
Jamil, M., T. R. H., et al. (2012). Computer-based-VS Paper-based Examinations: Perceptions of University Teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 11(4).
Noyes, J. M. and K. J. Garland (2008). Computer- vs. Paper-Tasks: Are They Equivalent?. Ergonomics. 51(9): 1352-1375.
O'Donoghue, J., G. Singh, et al. (2004). A comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages of IT based Education and the Implications upon Students. Interactive Educational Multimedia. 9: 63-76.
Tseng, M. (2008). The Difficulties that EFL Learners Have with Reading Text on the Web. The Internet TESL. XIV(2).
Tseng, M. (2010). Factors that Influence Online Reading: An Investigation into EFL Students' Perceptio. The Reading Matrix. 10(1).
Zajacova, A., S. M. Lynch, et al. (2005). Self-Efficacy, Stressm and Academic Success in College. Research in Higher Education. 46(6).
Zhao, L. (2016). Motivation in Chinese Children's English Teaching. Open Journal of Social Sciences 4: 185-188.
How to Cite