THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY AND READING COMPREHENSION AT THE TENTH GRADE OF SMAN 3 KABUPATEN TANGERANG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2019/2020

Authors

  • Ika Rosiyatul Hurriyah Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf Tangerang
  • Nirna Nirmala Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf Tangerang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v1i1.479

Abstract

Abstract

 

This article presents the analysis of metacognitive strategy and reading comprehension. The result shows that there is not any positive relationship between these variables. Although the metacognitive strategy of students is high, it does not contribute to the improvement of the ability of the students reading comprehension at SMAN 3 Curug in academic year 2019/2020. The research findings shows there is no correlation between metacognitive strategy and reading comprehension of students in SMAN 3 Curug. As the result, the value skills obtained by students was associated with the understanding of the low reading comprehension skills. These conditions also influenced in decreasing metacognitive strategy of the students, because they will feel hopeless with the result obtained. The findings of this research also have implications to the teachers, some efforts given to students by awarding something to students was useless. Therefore, the teachers are expected to try doing another approach to improve the student metacognitive strategy by praising or giving reward in order to appreciate what students done.

Keywords: metacognitive strategy, reading strategy, reading comprehension

References

References

Brown, H. D. (2003). language assessment : Principles and Classroom Practices. In Pearson

Education. California: San Frasisco State.: University.

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Pearson Education Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students reading strategie. Journal of

Development Education, 25(3), 2–10. Retrieved from http://laurenyal.myefolio.com/Uploads/Survey2002Mokhtari.pdf

Pang S. Elizabeth, Muaka Angaluki, B. B. E. and K. L. M. (2005). Teaching Reading. In W. J. Herbert

(Ed.), University of Illinoist. Chicago: University of Illinoist. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1174

Rastegar, M., Mehrabi Kermani, E., & Khabir, M. (2017). The Relationship between Metacognitive Reading Strategies Use and Reading Comprehension Achievement of EFL Learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 07(02), 66. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2017.72006

Reza Ahmadi, M., Nizam Ismail, H., & Kamarul Kabilan Abdullah, M. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 237. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p235

Sugiyono. (2016a). Metode penelitian. In Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed., p. 42). Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from Alfabetacv

Sugiyono. (2016b). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,Kualitatif,dan R&D. In D. Sugiyono (Ed.), Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed., p. 80). Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from www.cvalfabeta.com

Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Relations among reading motivation, reading amount,

and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.022

Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive Strategies as Points in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228(June), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.091

Foremost Journal UNIS

Downloads

Published

2020-02-20

How to Cite

Hurriyah, I. R., & Nirmala, N. (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY AND READING COMPREHENSION AT THE TENTH GRADE OF SMAN 3 KABUPATEN TANGERANG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2019/2020. Foremost Journal (Foreign Language Models, Studies, and Research Publication), 1(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v1i1.479

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Volume 1 No. 1 February 2020; Foremost Journal; eISSN: 2721-642X

Section

Articles

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors transfer or license the copyright of publishing to Foremost Journal to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to Foremost Journal a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC-SA License.