The Effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Reading Comprehension at Eleventh Grade at SMA Al-Ijtihad In Academic Year 2018/2019

Authors

  • Nurul Islami Dewi Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf
  • Imam Sudarmaji Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v1i2.782

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This research aims at finding out the effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) strategy at eleventh grade of SMA Al-Ijtihad Kota Tangerang. This research was quantitative with the quasi-experimental to chose the sample, and got 57 students to two classes : one experimental and one control. The experimental class (XI IPS 2) which was taught by Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) strategy, whereas the control class (XI IPS 1) which was taught by Conventional Instruction (CI). The researcher used the written test to collect the data, and counting the data with the chi square formula to test normality data, fisher formula to test homogeneity data. The result of this research showed the students' score of reading comprehension after taught by Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is good, because the mean value of post-test which was taught by is Content and Language Integrated Learning  (CLIL) higher than students which was taught by Conventional Instruction (CI). So, the gained results of the research indicated that Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) strategy is an  effective strategy on  improving students' reading comprehension, however there are some constraints on the language used by the researchers in this strategy, namely the use of English to convey the material.

 

References

REFERENCES

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching Reading. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 124–141. Development, F. (2004). Formative and Summative Assessment.

Hamidavi, N., Amiz, M. S., & Gorjian, B. (2016). The effect of CLIL method on teaching reading comprehension to junior high school students. Bulletin de La Société Royale Des Sciences de Liège, 85(1998), 1642–1652.

Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers ’ summative practices and assessment for learning – tensions and synergies, 16(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500136093

Harrop, E. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning ( CLIL ): Limitations and possibilities, (Clil), 57–70.

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers Second Edition.

Khusniyah, N. L., & Lustyantie, N. (2017). Improving English Reading Comprehension Ability through Survey, Questions, Read, Record, Recite, Review Strategy (SQ4R). English Language Teaching, 10(12), 202. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p202

Klingner, J. K. (2015). Assessing Reading Comprehension, 59–70.

Knutson, E. M. (1997). Reading with a Purpose : Communicative Reading Tasks for the Foreign Language Classroom, (1).L . Dale & R . Tanner. (2017). Review of the book CLIL activities : A resource for subject and language teachers ( with CD-ROM ) , by L . Dale & R .Tanner 1, (April), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2013.6.1.5

Lesiak, K. (2015). Teaching English to adolescents, 1, 246–260.

Lilija Vilkancienė, I. R. (2013). Clil Teacher Competences and Attitudes. ISM University of Management and Economics, Lithuania, 2019, 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/sm-2017-0019

Mckee, S. (2012). Reading Comprehension , What We Know : A Review of Research 1995 to 2011. Language Testing in Asia, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-1-45

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Dewi, N. I., & Sudarmaji, I. (2020). The Effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Reading Comprehension at Eleventh Grade at SMA Al-Ijtihad In Academic Year 2018/2019. Foremost Journal, 1(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v1i2.782